SAM FARHA vs PHIL HELLMUTH WSOP 2003

Uploaded by: xmonco
Video Description:

SAM FARHA WITH QJs VS PHIL HELLMUTH KA IN WSOP 2003

Tags for this video: Farha HELLMUTH PHIL Poker Sam WPT WSOP

Find more videos in the "Sports" category
See more videos uploaded by xmonco

Related Videos

Phil Hellmuth vs Sam Farha	Full house vs Full House ( wait for Gus's comment ;)	Phil Hellmuth Explodes

Chris Moneymaker VS Sam Farha WSOP 2003 Best Bluff	Sammy Farha Wins 2006 WSOP 5k O8 Bracelet	Phil Hellmuth wins his 11th WSOP Bracelet!

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

Raisy Daisy ( 4 weeks ago by Fotsirvelk)

Raisy Daisy

Exactly, phil is ... ( 4 weeks ago by efh0888)

Exactly, phil is playing tournament and farha is playing cash game. You don't call a pf raise like that out of position w/ QJ in a tourney, unless you had some hyper aggressive player raising every pot w/ any 2 cards.

Do you wonna play ... ( 4 weeks ago by willemrules)

Do you wonna play poker and make no risk losing money go to
pokerstrategy(.)com/u034S3 and you'll get 50 dollar for free + 100 dollar bonus.
Try it now !

ya know phil thats ... ( 3 weeks ago by jaackjames)

ya know phil thats called gambling.

1 word too say ... ( 3 weeks ago by gunsblazin1000)

1 word too say about tht comment bfm92 bullshit!

I love Phil.... ... ( 3 weeks ago by loopstheloop)

I love Phil.... mainly because I sympathise with him on these bad beats. Sammy's a donk.

how was that a bad ... ( 3 weeks ago by powerrocket21)

how was that a bad beat?!?, a Q,J, Suited is not a bad starting had to begin with, more mediocre than anything. Not to mention on the flop Sammy had a flush draw and a gut shot straight draw. By the flop Hellmuth only had 53% chance of winning this hand. In total he had 12 outs to win the hand, excluding runner runner q or j, which gives him roughly 47% chance to win. So pretty much its a coin flip and Sammy hit his card. Do your math right before you accuse a bad beat on someone.

what were the ... ( 3 weeks ago by powerrocket21)

what were the blinds at, at this point of the game? because a 35,000 bet may only be 3-5 times the big blind which would be around 5k. 35k may sound big but if the blinds are this high, not to mention ante's, then this is a normal raise

Lol, you plonker. ... ( 3 weeks ago by loopstheloop)

Lol, you plonker. Blinds were at 3k and 6k. Phil purposefully bet over 5 times the BB because Sammy will generally call with rubbish, because Sammy is a fish. Sammy made an error in his original call, and was rewarded for his poor play. It's not the worst beat on YT, or on Phil on YT, but it's a bad beat nonetheless. You do the mathSSSSS correctly, mate.

lol mathS ( 3 weeks ago by mkenne14)

lol mathS

well, in fairness.. ... ( 3 weeks ago by loopstheloop)

well, in fairness.... ;-)

Sam Farha is an ... ( 2 weeks ago by gaud123)

Sam Farha is an inferior player?

it is a bad beat he ... ( 2 weeks ago by leatherandy)

it is a bad beat he was miles ahead pre flop he had to hit to win

BTW, why did Phil ... ( 2 weeks ago by gaud123)

BTW, why did Phil check on the flop when he was in position? Isn't the point of slow playing to BUILD the pot?

damn hellmuth made ... ( 2 weeks ago by MrCheckRaise1)

damn hellmuth made the biggest mistake checking top/top with 2 diamonds and 2 straight cards on the board, and he also had position on sammy...betting the flop and getting called in 80% of the times means that the opponent out of position is on a draw. in poker a bet can help you to get information, it's not only to get value. i always do it when i play, a small bet can save you from a big hit to your stack, that's my rule.

Hey could someone ... ( 2 weeks ago by fatman1997cw)

Hey could someone lend me some money on Full Tilt Poker? I am trying to get going on there. My user name is fatdad100.

bad call? why ... ( 2 weeks ago by chris871)

bad call? why shouldn;t u call with QJ
phil checked the flop :S
now that's bad play.
and then not knowing when you;re beat.
even worse.

agreed, he should ... ( 1 week ago by 40523640)

agreed, he should have bet the size of the pot, if not more on the flop, to give farha terrible odds to flush.

Sam Farha isn't an ... ( 1 week ago by MusclesfromB)

Sam Farha isn't an inferior player you donkey shit, he just gambles sometimes

I agree that Phil ... ( 1 week ago by Keyabr)

I agree that Phil should of bet the flop for sure. But you don't really think Farha would lay down a flush draw and gut shot straight draw vs Phil do you? Farha is loose as can be and would of taken more chips from Phil if Phil had let out.
So yes Phil should of bet but in hindsight he saved himself some chips by not firing out on the flop.

yes farha probably ... ( 1 week ago by chris871)

yes farha probably would have called.
but by firing on the flop phil would have at least known where he's at

indeed, the bet was ... ( 1 week ago by MrCheckRaise1)

indeed, the bet was not to induce farha to fold, just to have a clue of what the opponent could have playing out of position...and phil's call on the turn and on the river show he didn't have a clue of farha's hand. by the way, phil is a great player for sure, but he overrated his hand.

LOL I SAID WHIT A ... ( 1 week ago by TheSpiritualShow)

LOL I SAID WHIT A QJ,

omg, bla bla bla, ... ( 21 hours ago by serratop)

omg, bla bla bla, lol, should should should, omg, onlineplayers

Tell a friend:

URL
Embed Code